NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR vs Tamron 35-150mm F/2-2.8 Di III VXD (Nikon Z)
Key differences
- —The NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR is 620g lighter (570g vs 1190g).
- —The 35-150mm F/2-2.8 Di III VXD (Nikon Z) is faster: f/2 vs f/4 (≈2.0 stops more light).
- —At launch the NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR cost $1,099 less ($900 vs $1,999).
- —For close-ups the NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR reaches 0.28× vs 0.17×.
- Mount
- Nikon Z (FX)
- Nikon Z (FX)
- Focal length
- 24–200mm
- 35–150mm
- Max aperture
- F4–6.3
- F2–2.8◆
- Weight
- 570g◆
- 1,190g
- Dimensions ⌀ × L
- 76.5 × 114.0mm
- 89.2 × 160.1mm
- Volume
- 524 cm³◆
- 1000 cm³
- Density
- 1.09 g/cm³
- 1.19 g/cm³
- Filter thread
- ⌀67mm
- ⌀82mm
- Min focus
- 0.50m
- 0.33m◆
- Max magnification
- 0.28×◆
- 0.17×
- Elements / groups
- 19 / 15
- 21 / 15
- Aperture blades
- 7
- 9◆
- Focus drive
- Stepping Motor (STM)
- VXD Linear Motor
- Stabilisation
- Yes
- —
- Weather sealed
- Yes
- Yes
- Aperture ring
- —
- —
- Released
- 2020
- 2023
- MSRP (USD)
- $900◆
- $1,999
- Sharpness
- 7.6
- 8.6◆
- Bokeh Rendering
- 6.8
- 8.3◆
- Autofocus Speed
- 8.0
- 8.6◆
- Flare Resistance
- 8.1◆
- 8.0
- Build / Sealing
- 7.8
- 8.4◆
- Value / Size
- 8.4
- 8.7◆
Performance overlay
- NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR
- 35-150mm F/2-2.8 Di III VXD (Nikon Z)
◆ marks the best value in a row. Scores are 0–10 editorial ratings.