Canon RF 14-35mm F4 L IS USM vs Canon RF 15-35mm F2.8 L IS USM
Key differences
- —The RF 14-35mm F4 L IS USM is 300g lighter (540g vs 840g).
- —The RF 15-35mm F2.8 L IS USM is faster: f/2.8 vs f/4 (≈1.0 stops more light).
- —At launch the RF 14-35mm F4 L IS USM cost $600 less ($1,699 vs $2,299).
- —For close-ups the RF 14-35mm F4 L IS USM reaches 0.38× vs 0.21×.
- Mount
- Canon RF
- Canon RF
- Focal length
- 14–35mm
- 15–35mm
- Max aperture
- F4
- F2.8◆
- Weight
- 540g◆
- 840g
- Dimensions ⌀ × L
- 84.1 × 99.8mm
- 88.5 × 126.8mm
- Volume
- 554 cm³◆
- 780 cm³
- Density
- 0.97 g/cm³
- 1.08 g/cm³
- Filter thread
- ⌀77mm
- ⌀82mm
- Min focus
- 0.20m◆
- 0.28m
- Max magnification
- 0.38×◆
- 0.21×
- Elements / groups
- 16 / 12
- 16 / 12
- Aperture blades
- 9
- 9
- Focus drive
- Nano USM
- Nano USM
- Stabilisation
- Yes
- Yes
- Weather sealed
- Yes
- Yes
- Aperture ring
- —
- —
- Released
- 2021
- 2019
- MSRP (USD)
- $1,699◆
- $2,299
- Sharpness
- 8.8
- 8.8
- Bokeh Rendering
- 7.2
- 7.6◆
- Autofocus Speed
- 8.8
- 9.0◆
- Flare Resistance
- 8.6◆
- 8.3
- Build / Sealing
- 8.7
- 9.3◆
- Value / Size
- 8.0◆
- 7.2
Performance overlay
- RF 14-35mm F4 L IS USM
- RF 15-35mm F2.8 L IS USM
◆ marks the best value in a row. Scores are 0–10 editorial ratings.